View Single Post
Old 01-30-2020, 01:21 PM   #28
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,841
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,295 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2499 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stomachbuzz View Post
First of all, it looks like you're in Canada, so....
Second, here's a website talking about fault vs. no-fault states and their rules
https://accident-law.freeadvice.com/...-accidents.htm

And here's a quote from that website:


Third, if you want to accept some bullshit excuse and get screwed, that's fine. You do you, bro.
But I won't get caught being made worse off because some clown hits my shit.

Someone damaging your property and not being properly reimbursed is literally against America. The Pursuit of Property is one of the inalienable rights that the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution were built on.
The U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights has several amendments and mentions in it to specifically protect citizens and their property.


Yes.


#1 - police are lazy. They do not want to file a police report. It is more paperwork for them to write a formal report vs. handing you a "case number" on the back of their business card.
If you ask them, they may give some answer such as "we only file a report if someone is injured and needs an ambulance"
The truth of this can vary by state, but it is in your best interest to pressure them to write a report. It will make fighting your claim much easier.

If there is no police report written, it can make it easy for the 'bad' driver to wiggle out of it being their fault, or lessen the severity of the accident. This mostly applies to accidents that 'could be argued'. For example, someone slams into your rear end at a red light, that's pretty much open and shut, but other collisions aren't as clear-cut.
As a result, you will need to rely on other evidence to prove it. Dash cam footage, pictures you might take of damage on the vehicles, their testimony, etc.

#2 you cousin got hit by a car crossing the street and there was no injury? That doesn't even make sense. Moving on...

#3 special collector car insurance for their restored vehicles
Not really the same thing... Those kinds of cars are not easily appraised, so a regular car insurance company (who specialized in insuring Toyota Corollas or similar) cannot properly gauge the value of the car.
Also, collector car insurance usually means the car is rarely driven, if at all. That's why it is often cheaper.
People would get this insurance for their show car, rarely driven, and it's mostly for peace of mind in case of theft, a natural disaster, or etc.



Again, no-fault state applies to personal injury, only. Not property damage.
The last line of your attachment summarizes it all. Yes somebody is "at fault" but it all goes through your own company. In that case your company will not pay for items that you did not pay premiums on. Why should they? There is also the very valid option of suing but that was the point of discussion about coverage.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote