View Single Post
Old 01-09-2020, 08:31 AM   #341
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,335
Thanks: 698
Thanked 2,086 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
biggie: lowering doesn't add "enough", at least if one doesn't overlower, which in turn may cause other issues with geometry/handling/susp. travel & compliance.
For example, for front i seen dual camberbolt sets maxed out at around -2.3 at stock height, if added reasonable lowering to that, IIRC maxing out will be at around -2.5 camber. There might be more extra camber gained from lowering at rear though, but not sure, as never considered lowering myself.
And why LCAs are mandatory in Pedders topmounts case? Rear LCAs are most common means to gain camber adjustment in rear on these cars. Pedder eccentric topmounts are meant for front, as one of means of extra camber with less NVH compromises vs pillowball camberplates.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote