View Single Post
Old 11-21-2019, 07:01 PM   #28
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Extrapolating from this post:

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...&postcount=185

Quote:
Originally Posted by AceHeader-MT View Post
350= max torque (202.4NM), lowest peak HP (175.1HP)
250= torque (approx 200NM), HP (approx 178)
150= lowest torque (approx 195NM), HP (approx 182)

These numbers are approximated off percentages of the 350 when we did a stock dyno run with OEM frontpipe
It could be hypothesized that the JDL 4-2-1 header might offer slightly higher peak horsepower, while offering less torque. What would be nice would be a dyno overlay of the 150 vs 250 vs 350 to really see where the plots shift, and it wouldn't be a stretch to infer that the JDL header might shift the plot over just one more spot, likely towards the top of the rpm range and potentially at the detriment of low end torque--if I was speculating.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote