Quote:
Originally Posted by killmequickly
Well then, the burden is on you to prove your claim, as far as I can tell your ~30 number is bs.
In his statement he said he was on his way to his mechanic, can he not go straight to his mechanic when he enters Sonoma? According to you, no, that's impossible lol. You just can't admit that you are assuming things that are not stated. Just FYI Sonoma has mechanics, did you bother to think his regular mechanic is at Sonoma?
Again, re-read the statement, he said he was driving 25mph during the turn, not that he was driving 25mph the whole way. He did not specify the speed outside of the turn, you are just cherry picking and assuming. No where in the entire statement did he say, "I drove 25mph for the 2-3 hour drive."
Now your just conflating random statements together, do you know DJ72 personally? no. Your just mad at the guy for one reason or another.
At least you admit he's not a shill anymore. Great, we've covered some ground.
You can say whatever you want but the fact remains that you admitted openly that you believe there is a problem with the engines from the start and that a class action is viable. Case closed.
|
You are so busy trying to counter my statements you are not grasping the meaning of them.
First off I am not saying I feel they did anything wrong. I thought that my concern that a Toyota lawyer would play the gambit was pretty clear when I said it the first time. People going into lawsuits of any type need to be careful what they post on the public internet. You can bet your ass that the Toyota legal team is reading this and any other social network materiel on the issue.
Yes, his mechanic could be at a RACETRACK. He was driving on a private road at a RACETRACK. The evidence is circumstantial but it was still a RACETRACK and that can be used to discredit the fire.
The question of how hard he was pushing the car for the 2 to 3 hours is certainly relevant. The fact (if accepted as fact)he had slowed to 25 just before it went does not mean it was not pushed to a breaking point prior to that.
The evidence to support my claim of 30 is there for the finding. It was a major topic of discussion for over two years. I followed the reports very closely because I was nervous it would become a much greater issue than it did. It was pretty much restricted to 2013 cars and they all had the same symptom of a spun bearing.
Yes I said that the people that had them blow up on a FACTORY SEALED engine had a case for class action against Subaru. The dealers didn't cause those ones the manufacturer did. They are two totally different scenarios. They have missed all time limits though so they are out of luck.
I am not mad at anybody. Not even you. I have concerns with things being said and am expressing them. How can I make it clear to you that I really want the people that suffered loss to recoup it. I just don't feel that the class action is the way to go and that throwing a pile of misleading info into the mix confuses the case even more. The article that sparked this latest debate made it appear that the cars are bursting into flames in droves. That is blatantly false but I guess that saying "Two cars caught fire" doesn't get them click and earn them money.