10-10-2019, 05:37 PM
|
#273
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,838
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,295 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2499 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan
Here they are together:
One of these things is not like the other...
I think that *minor* design details like black a-pillars may be influencing opinions here. AS far as the shapes of the cars, *particularly* from the A-pillars back, the concept and production cars are *clearly* very similar, and quite a bit different from the boxy tC. A-pillar forward, the concept has a much lower hoodline, more sloped downward towards the front of the car, and less bulbous fenders above the front wheels, which is *less* like the tC.
Are you guys being thrown off by minor details like the tC and concept both having black a-pillars? Or something?
As noted before, the concept is *slightly* less cab-rearward, so *slightly* less 240Z-like. But still a LOT closer to the production FT86 than to a 240Z, which is *really* cab-rearward!

Jeezis I need another 240Z...
|
We get it you don't see it. We can and do. Maybe you you just don't want to see it.
What you described is the squashed tC that started this.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
|
|
|