View Single Post
Old 08-23-2019, 11:42 AM   #83
extrashaky
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ Limited
Location: USA
Posts: 4,046
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 5,620 Times in 2,267 Posts
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
They don't make up their shortfalls by increasing everybody's rates...
They do here and in most places with a no fault scheme. As I said, the insurer is prohibited by law from increasing the claimant's rates if he wasn't at fault. If the at fault driver is insured with another company, the claimant's insurer has no way to recoup their claims expense from him either.

What the claimant's insurer can do instead under state law is aggregate all their claims expenses in their annual data call submitted to the state, then use that as support to petition the department of insurance for rate increases across the board. The state rarely denies a rate increase, again because of economics. DFS is afraid that denying rate increases will cause insurers to leave Florida, restrict the kinds of policies they offer or deny coverage altogether for riskier drivers, which in turn has the effect of driving average rates up anyway.

If your rates went down when no fault went into effect, it wasn't because of no fault insurance. It was because there was something else holding your rates artificially high that was corrected at the same time. If they had fixed whatever that problem was while keeping the at fault system, your rates would be even lower today.
extrashaky is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to extrashaky For This Useful Post:
Summerwolf (08-23-2019)