View Single Post
Old 05-24-2019, 07:44 AM   #24
ETM_Shaman
Member
 
ETM_Shaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: 2013 Toyota GT86
Location: Lima - Peru
Posts: 30
Thanks: 2
Thanked 113 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
So what you have found is that the inlet is inadequate because sustained rpms leads to a drop in inlet pressure, and that leads to cavitation, right?

A few points of confusion:

--Shouldn't cavitation lead to a more significant drop in outlet pressure if that is the cause of the oil starvation, and you showed only a small difference in outlet pressures?

--If cavitation is happening then couldn't that metal debris be a cause of bearing failure? Moreover, shouldn't it show up in an engine oil test as metal in the oil?

--If this is the cause of oil starvation then couldn't this be replicated on a dyno or something, meaning, if it is just sustained rpms, and not sustained lateral g's or something else commonly related to track oil starvation, then couldn't it be replicated in a static environment? Is it common for oil starvation failure to happen, for instance, during a top speed run (ie long sustained rpms)?
1. Yes I also expected to see a bigger increase in outlet pressure, itīs still a little mistery to me.

2. The ammount of aluminum it erodes is insignificant (probably less than 1.0 g). I donīt think it would show in an UOA or cause any damage. The importance of finding it is that itīs hard evidence that cavitation is happening. Iīd love to see a close up pic of that part of a brand new oil pump.

3. Yes absolutely. My bearing failures where never at the track with high lateral gīs like to think about that. They happened accelerating in a straight line, at high RPMs. It couldīve happened at the dyno, I just wasnīt there.
__________________
ETM_Shaman is offline   Reply With Quote