View Single Post
Old 05-07-2019, 03:42 AM   #791
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Snooze View Post
Ok, stupid questions time. Ready?
Where would a new MR2 fit into the line up? Above or below the 86? If it were below wouldn't that be the SFR? Wasn't the MR2 a "budget" sports car? How would a new MR2 be different from an 86? I'm not confident of a new MR2 being mid-engined: too much compromise.
The MR2 turbo in 1998 was $25k, so no the 86 is not comparable. The 86 is more comparable to an AE86 of the 80’s, or a fast/expensive Corolla or a Celica of the 90’s. Back then the sports car market was more saturated and there was crossover in price so a awd turbo Celica may have been more expensive than a base MR2, and a top trim turbo MR2 might have been more expensive than base NA Supra. Similarly, a top trim Ford Escape or Flex might be more expensive than a bottom trim Flex or Explorer, respectively.

Considering Toyota is finding partners to build their cars, I don’t know who they would partner with who makes a cheap mid engine chassis. I doubt they would put the money into a one off chassis.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote