View Single Post
Old 07-15-2012, 05:11 AM   #503
Coheed
Senior Member
 
Coheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: DGM BRZ Limited
Location: Seattle
Posts: 813
Thanks: 209
Thanked 225 Times in 157 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by inz View Post
I know exactly why they did it and it's a great package for what it is - I'm sure you gathered from my post that I'm not a fan of boxer engines which is clearly a baised opinion.

It's all a little over complicated if you ask me, a straight 4 TOYOTA engine would have been a much better option. Any hey, everyone knows the cure for understeer is more power
I agree for the most part. The boxer design has inherent limitations when it comes to its design. An inline 4 would have been a great option, provided toyota didn't use any current designs.

All the new toyota engines I have worked on have shown great promise, with poor execution or a large focus on fuel economy/emissions. they have been weak in factory form, and don't enjoy hp mods without power-related failure in stock-form.

The 5s and 3sgte were strong engines, their new engines are weak.

A great, chain-drive 86x86 inline 4 would be sweet. But in the company of SR20, 4B11, and K20... it's got tough competition
Coheed is offline   Reply With Quote