View Single Post
Old 10-19-2018, 09:46 PM   #96
Jaden
Road-hole
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
No he's full of shit...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristor View Post
Where have you seen that? All the data I've seen indicates that the only performance differential between the manual and the auto is due to final drive gearing. This would affect the torque output shown on a chassis dyno, so I suppose it could show a different in horsepower based on that, but it shouldn't really create a significant affect. The transmission itself accounts for only a small portion of drivetrain loss.
The difference in dyno results is mainly between a mustang dyno (heartbreak) and a dynojet.

Mustang's typically show about 145-150 and dynojets between 165-170 for a baseline.

Dynojets are more likely a more accurate representation based on what driveline losses SHOULD be from BHP ratings, but for some reason people like mustang dynos for gain comparisons and think that for showing gains, they're more accurate.

Go figure...

If he got 206 whp from a mustang dyno, that's pretty significant for 91 octane (especially canadian 91) and could be showing good gains for ITBs.


Jaden
Jaden is offline   Reply With Quote