View Single Post
Old 09-03-2018, 06:57 PM   #11
johan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: '14 981CS, '99 NB1
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,274
Thanks: 1,234
Thanked 1,201 Times in 631 Posts
Mentioned: 114 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultramaroon View Post
Right? I was hoping to get there. Not as a gotcha or anything, mind you. Discussion is free and interesting.
10 Kilogram/millimeter = 559.974147 pound force/inch

So, actually the swift springs are not exactly 10k.

557 pound force/inch = 9.946888 Kilogram/millimeter

Yes, it's borderline pedantry to argue about, but one could assert that if they wanted to claim it was "exact", it'd be within 1 pound force/inch... So 559 or 560, certainly not 557.

Honestly, with a spring, I'd be more concerned about the standard deviation. And that speaks to earlier posts in this thread about testing a bunch of Sprint's springs. They certainly are not all exactly the same, that is statistically impossible given metallurgical and manufacturing variance. With a test across several springs of the same spec, we could establish if the STD is within a reasonable % - and that would speak to the overall quality of Swift in some objective manner.

The same test should be done with Taiwan brand x and y. Then we can compare STD across brands for an even more informed opinion.

If you wanted to extend the test, you'd also include some simulated mileage on a dyno and then retest to see how stable the metallurgy of the springs is: 1) how much has their rate changed over time 2) what is the STD on that change across springs.

Could be very fascinating and revealing data.
johan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to johan For This Useful Post:
gtpvette (09-04-2018), Irace86.2.0 (09-08-2018), Spuds (09-04-2018), Tcoat (09-03-2018), Tristor (09-04-2018), wparsons (09-04-2018), x808drifter (09-03-2018), ZionsWrath (09-09-2018)