View Single Post
Old 07-01-2018, 04:31 PM   #33
86TOYO2k17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2017 toyota 86
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 336
Thanked 1,189 Times in 781 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperTom View Post
Im down to 2500lbs with still an ungutted interior. Major compromise I had to give up was AC delete for only 15lbs so I may consider putting that back in.


I did chunks at a time to feel the difference.
I did lighter wheels/tire along with lighter pulley
I did Lightweight Wilwood front brakes (-30lbs) and CF driveshaft
I did lightweight battery with rear seat delete
I removed front and rear bumper beam and same time
I did empty windshield reservoir & AC delete with spare tire/jack removal


The method was to keep the front & rear loss close each time to maintain the stock balance built into car.
Each time I noticed a drastic improvement in acceleration.


The OP's question will reducing reciprocating mass improve HP? No. But the car will get to the same HP #'s up high quicker is how I see it.
Where you able to get any before / after testing for any amount of weight reduction? 0-60 1/4m or any rolling pull would be must accurate probably?

I’ve only done a little testing just with different amounts of fuel. It seems like from my testing every 25lbs (4gallons) of gas less I have shaves .1sec off 0-60. Would be interested to see if your weight reduction shaved off .5+secs if you had any conclusive testing/data.
86TOYO2k17 is offline   Reply With Quote