View Single Post
Old 04-27-2018, 06:09 PM   #4
mrg666
pessimistic skeptic
 
mrg666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: '14 FR-S Monogram AT JRSC
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,786
Thanks: 1,713
Thanked 1,054 Times in 694 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
So you are saying to not switch to the WRX valve? Why was this valve even suggested? Is it because with FI there is more pressure, so the WRX valve is designed around that pressure level? People suggested to switch why?... does it relieve pressure better with a larger opening or does it have a smaller opening to prevent excessive oil blowby through the PCV system?
Because WRX valve is designed for boosted engine and can hold higher pressure inside intake manifold from leaking into crankcase while stock valve starts to leak that boost into crankcase. But crankcase starts ventilating more oil with the air that goes into intake manifold with a boosted engine. When the oil catch can is added to avoid that oil going to intake manifold, it is also better to avoid the boost pressure expanding into catch can before being stopped on the PCV side. That is why adding a check valve between the catch can and intake manifold is better than replacing the PCV valve with WRX valve. Since boost is blocked at the exit of intake manifold, check valve reacts quicker. Hope I didn't make this too complicated

Edit: Another benefit is that the oil clogs up the PCV valve mechanism after a while. However, the check valve will experience less oil on the other side of oil catch can.
mrg666 is offline   Reply With Quote