View Single Post
Old 04-20-2018, 03:30 PM   #58
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,834
Thanks: 888
Thanked 1,078 Times in 681 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomm.brz View Post
really?zero?
you think a boxer engine doesnt contribute to Lower center of gravity? wpuld you think our cars would have this chassis without a boxer?

You must mean the lower center of gravity for a motor that is significantly heavier than an I4 of similar displacement and output. Then start bolting all the accessories to the top of the boxer, and your CoG is back up to where an I4 would be with it's low mount accessories, plus it's still 100 pounds heavier. Explain to me what part of this chassis is due to the boxer layout (aside from the huge frame rail spacing needed to accommodate the incredibly wide motor), and then explain why Honda can make an S2000, or Mazda can have the Miata, both of which are the 86's handling equal or better, all with the 'disadvantage' of an I4. Subaru's boxer motor is a brand distinction tool at this point - nothing else. Zero to be gained.
__________________
"To know a thing well, know it's limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen." Amtal Rule
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote