Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0
Dirty tactics was my interpretation of your attitude to subprime loans and the general perception of them from the rest of the market analysts, and was used to spice up the verbage.
Again, where is the evidence? Where is the link? I’ve provided links. You keep claiming things about Nissan without links. The claim hasn’t been demonstrated nor does the math add up to substantiate any secondary claim that their vehicles aren’t good.
And the other point is everything innovate and exciting died from many brands. Until the 86, what did Toyota have that was exciting? At least Nissan had a sports car in the Z and the GTR for a while. What about Honda? They released the NSX how many years after the GTR? The Type R just came to the states to give the Civic more appeal than a suped up econobox? It is not like the other guys have done much to break the status quo. I’m no Nissan fan boy, but I’m saying their position in the market suggests they are building good cars.
|
One link to an article three years old, and some sales figures..... I am saying what should be considered common knowledge, or at least rational thought.
You could compare companies all day long, certain companies just have more of a loyal following than others and don't need neccesarilly develop a new following at this time. The car market is very cyclical.