View Single Post
Old 03-20-2018, 12:09 PM   #93
bfrank1972
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S Argento
Location: Westport,CT
Posts: 1,855
Thanks: 517
Thanked 1,041 Times in 616 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yardjass View Post
I highly doubt that for a naturally aspirated 2 to 2.5 liter flat four, which would be comparable to a Honda K20/K24. The Honda K series is basically a masterpiece and there's a reason very few companies have something comparable.
Why? It's not alien technology.

It's a well designed motor for sure - but even if it had some 'secret sauce' it would be easy enough for anyone to reverse engineer and build their own version (given sufficient budget).

Also I didn't say Subaru could necessarily engineer a *flat four* with equivalent efficiency - motor configurations all have different strengths/weaknesses - my point was rather that different constraints and design decisions impact the overall efficiency/output of an engine system. It's not because we're 'going in reverse' with engine technology (as someone mentioned in the thread), quite the opposite.
bfrank1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bfrank1972 For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (03-20-2018), venturaII (03-21-2018)