Quote:
Originally Posted by switchlanez
Your first statement is completely vague with no formation leading up to opinion so there's nothing to cherry pick. You left it wide open for interpretation. Fair game for him to form an opinion from scratch and impossible to cherry pick from your non-formulations. Logically (or illogically), you said:
(1) Cayman = FR-S
(2) FR-S = !FR-S
(3) FR-S = !Cayman
Substitute RHS of (2) into RHS of (1) and you get:
(4) Cayman = !FR-S
Substitute LHS of (4) into RHS of (2) and you get:
FR-S = Cayman
Substitute RHS of (1) into RHS of that result and you get:
FR-S = FR-S
You set yourself up to disprove your statement. 
|
set up for discourse? sure. disproof? nah. being open for discussion is not the same as being open to have words put in my mouth.