View Single Post
Old 03-05-2018, 11:42 AM   #17
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,672
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,012 Times in 2,098 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee View Post
So to make this short, the front alignment was exactly what I wanted. 1.8 camber 0 toe.

However in the rear, the technician said he could get 1.3 camber on the left rear(exactly what I wanted), but on the right rear he could only get down to 2.1 camber. So I had to settle and get 2.1 camber on both sides of the rear
So you were using camber adjustment to minimize rear camber for street, not to maximize it for track, right?

-2.1 rear camber is fine as long as you keep rear toe minimized. I'd go for zero rear toe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee View Post
I think he was able to get very little toe, like 2%, in the rear with -1.3* camber. So, why was he not able to get 1.3 on the right side?
2% rear toe? Toe is generally reported as either mm, fractions of an inch, or degrees, or sometimes arc-minutes. Units are easy at zero, 0° = 0 mm = 0 in. = 0 arc-minutes

Can't speak to clunking issue...
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote