View Single Post
Old 02-22-2018, 10:46 AM   #40446
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,841
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,295 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2499 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoobsMcGee View Post
NYC has a no-fault policy as well. I believe it was to help curb insurance fraud. People would buy two cars with catastrophic issues that are worth something if in perfect working order. They'd then target a victim and have one person box them in, then the other cut in front of them and slam the brakes. Since typically the person who rear-ended someone is at fault without contest, they would collect the value of a pristine vehicle against the victim's insurance.
There were several reason why Ontario went no fault and fraud was one of them. The term is confusing since there is actually still fault assigned. Things such as rate increases only impact the person that is at fault so the other person doesn't really take the brunt of the claim. What it really smooths out is the payment of claims. Since there are not two companies d1ckering back and forth payments are fast and relatively easy. Keep in mind that accident claims in Canada are usually just covering the vehicle damage. Since the Health Care is already "free" there are rarely medical costs that need to be paid.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
Cole (02-22-2018)