Quote:
Originally Posted by gtengr
Right, a business case, which is money, which I don't disagree with and never did (see posts mentioning "administrative"). There's not a limitation in the actual emissions requirements that would have prevented the intake tract, they just didn't want to take the financial hit. That is the very first point I made about emissions ITT.
|
Who cares if it's a business case. It's still a reason to not include the manifolds. I skipped over most of your posts when you became combative, calling people idiots and all that, so I guess I don't understand what your "point" is. Could you please explain what your "point" is and how it has anything to do with the OP?