Thread: why subaru why?
View Single Post
Old 02-16-2018, 03:41 PM   #131
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,099 Times in 3,030 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtengr View Post
Yep, I think we all see how Subaru was inconsistent in their documentation. That's a tangent discussion though, and doesn't factor that much into my opinion. There are plenty of new passenger cars on the road generating higher emissions than a twin with an aluminum intake, composite intake, tS package, etc.

So you want to throw away tangent discussion, but bring out other new passenger cars that generate higher emissions, even though the point of this thread is to discuss why Subaru didn't put the revised components onto AT + EU-spec cars.

I'll see myself out the door now, since this discussion involves all 2017 and newer passenger cars and not about the BRZ.
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mav1178 For This Useful Post:
ermax (02-16-2018)