[Tcoat]

Originally Posted by gtengr

Do you understand the concept of proving a negative? The burden of proof is on you. I'm saying there's not a rule or limit that would've prevented Subaru from adding the changes and recertifying the car if they had wanted to pay for those expenses. You disagree. Therefore, it's up to you to state the specific limitation that would prevent Subaru from meeting emissions. And because I've already acknowledged the administrative side of things in my 2nd post ITT, you have to assume Subaru is willing to pay for all administrative costs (recertification tests, paper work, penalty due to fleet numbers, etc.). So, what is this specific legal limitation?

You are the one stating an absolute. It can not be made without proof.