Thread: why subaru why?
View Single Post
Old 02-16-2018, 02:36 PM   #124
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,841
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,295 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2499 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtengr View Post
I understand that the numbers are blended. You're still missing my point. Subaru could have added these parts, but it would have would have cost them money. What VW did is in another league. I'm not saying Subaru should have added these parts and tried to skirt recertification.



It's all a matter of perspective. I'd say it's more indicative of how debates get out of hand when reading comprehension is lacking.



Right, a business case, which is money, which I don't disagree with and never did (see posts mentioning "administrative"). There's not a limitation in the actual emissions requirements that would have prevented the intake tract, they just didn't want to take the financial hit. That is the very first point I made about emissions ITT.
Proof?
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote