Thread: why subaru why?
View Single Post
Old 02-15-2018, 10:57 AM   #38
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,841
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,295 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2499 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ermax View Post
I will start with saying I know nothing about the testing process but I can imagine it's incredibly expensive. Perhaps they didn't find it worth the investment for just a 25% market share. Not that it wouldn't pass but just not worth the cost/headache.
This could most certainly be a factor especially if the Subaru/Toyota engineers already knew that the AT would be close to or exceed the limits. At some point the cost analysis would say it just isn't worth it. Since the AT cars did get all the other improvements there had to be some very strong reason they did not do them all. We will never be privy to that info though.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote