View Single Post
Old 01-15-2018, 02:56 PM   #56
NOHOME
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: RAVEN
Location: LONDON ONTARIO
Posts: 795
Thanks: 86
Thanked 800 Times in 346 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
Silly flat four? For $25k, what were you expecting? Something greater than 100hp/l from a naturally aspirated motor? It is a low center of gravity, front/mid engine layout, you know, a similar formula as the Porsche Caymen, a pretty amazing handling car like the 86.
Actually, the power output is not something that I object to with the Subaru flat four. 200 hp per liter is nothing special in today's world, but it will do just fine for the driving that I do.

The reason that I call it a silly design is that two cylinder heads and 4 cams, for a 4 banger does not strike me as good design. As to the center of gravity thing...you realize that we are maybe talking 2" difference in the engine's center of gravity over a conventional engine. In the grand scheme of the car's total center of gravity, it is oversold as a feature.

The other thing is that from above or below, it is just offensive to look at compared to a traditional L or V configuration. Highly personal and subjective I realize.
NOHOME is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NOHOME For This Useful Post:
BirgeyT1 (01-16-2018)