View Single Post
Old 07-07-2012, 05:30 PM   #14
Asterisked Accolade
Pedals over Paddles.
 
Asterisked Accolade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Celica GT-S | 89 Supra | 07' Accent
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,255
Thanks: 377
Thanked 684 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahausheer View Post
TRD does superchargers and there are other OEMS as well. However, OEMs like turbos because of they are better for MPG sake compared to superchargers and there is massive pressure for good MPG's. I am teaching myself about the various FI methods and turbos seem the worst, although to be honest I have only ever driven a car with a Turbo. The appeal of a SC is its simplicity, reliability, and low end power/torque. What are the downsides other than the above mentioned heat soak.

Also I have searched the internet and I even bought a book on street supercharging. All of my research suggests SC are better. Why else would TRD use a SC? Surely Toyota can do no wrong.
Putting heat-soak aside, I think it would basically come down to personal preference and what type of power you're looking for-- low end grunt or mid to top-end speed.
__________________

2002 Celica GT-S Track Car | 1989 Supra Track Car | 2007 Hyundai Accent AutoX | 2003 Cadillac CTS Daily
Asterisked Accolade is offline   Reply With Quote