View Single Post
Old 11-30-2017, 12:59 AM   #30
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtengr View Post
They would have a similar discrepancy in flywheel horsepower too. FI takes hp to operate but it's not the same as drivetrain losses.
Drivetrain losses seem to be a percentage of horsepower. Spinning a supercharger is probably more of a fixed number. Big blowers might take 200hp to turn. Small ones much less. Regardless, a turbo will show higher whp for a given engine hp.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 86 South Africa View Post
Lol. No manufacturer would do this on purpose.
The torque dip is the nexus of emissions and global laws Toyota had to meet combined with building a “cheaper” sports car.

More time and money (& a change in design) and they’d probably solve this.

Just headers + a tune remove the dip.
Yeah it is there for emissions and gas mileage probably mostly. I’m just suggesting it could be a good thing, and if so perhaps designed.
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote