11-16-2017, 01:07 PM
|
#35
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,838
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,295 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2499 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzleSAURUS
I largely agree with you. I think we'll see an FX20 and FX25 block, with different head and induction packaging combos. (Likely a performance head, and an economy head, design it all to hold boost, and use a headgasket, or maybe a different head casting to differentiate compression.)
I sort of liken it to how GM has the LS in everything from luxo-cruisers, work trucks, sports car, etc, all just packaged a bit differently.
If we look to 2007ish in Subaru history, the EJ25 NA, EJ25 Turbo, and EG36 were the only motor options.
Now, we have FA20, FB20, FB25, EJ25 turbo, EG36, it's really unnecessary.
Even simplifying it to a product stack like 07-ish would have huge cost savings. I still can't believe the EJ25 is still in production.
Simplifying it to a 2.0l and 2.5l block, both built to take boost, and using a variable head casting I *think* could make a lot of sense in simplifying the product stack.
|
Yes!
This is why I have a hard time believing there is a 2.4 in the works. A company doesn't try to streamline all their cars to one platform and then start making different engines for each and every one of them. They already have a lot of money invested in developing the FB engines so I don't see the case for building yet another type.
Could be totally wrong but we shall see eventually.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
|
|
|