View Single Post
Old 11-10-2017, 05:32 PM   #45
Dadhawk
Senior Member
 
Dadhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 20,109
Thanks: 39,674
Thanked 25,440 Times in 11,602 Posts
Mentioned: 187 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
To me, I just don't care about the definitions of a sports car and what it is, probably because I have it all wrong anyway.

Everything that is defined as a "pure sports car" is what I consider a roadster instead (convertible, two seater, etc). I would never do anything involving "sport" in a roadster.

A sports car has to have a roof because I don't want to race a convertible (well, unless its an F1/Indy car).

I consider the Twins/Z's/most supercars, sports cars, basically road capable cars that can be run on a road course type race track. Roadsters can too, but not by me.

It's sort of like when someone says the Saturn V/Apollo rocket flew to the moon. No, its a rocket it doesn't "fly". Given enough thrust a brick can move through the atmosphere but that doesn't make it aerodynamic.

Flying means you have some level of control left behind when there is not power, and some chance of landing safely. Airplanes/helicopters/gliders/even the space shuttle "fly" when relieved of power. Rockets become bricks, hence they don't fly.
__________________
Olivia 05/03/2012 - 01/06/2024. 231,146 glorious miles.

Visit my Owner's Journal where I wax philosophic on all things FR-S
Post your 86 or see others in front of a(n) (in)famous landmark.
What fits in your 86? Show us the "Junk In Your Trunk".
Dadhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dadhawk For This Useful Post:
chaoskaze (11-11-2017), humfrz (11-10-2017), Ultramaroon (11-10-2017)