View Single Post
Old 09-26-2017, 09:52 PM   #18
VerusEric
 
VerusEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: BRZ, STI, GT350R, Supra, 987.2
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,146
Thanks: 567
Thanked 2,529 Times in 780 Posts
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nav View Post
If I recall correctly, the S2000 gearbox came stock with carbon synchros. Eric, is there any way you can use metrics to quantify the difference between the stock and these carbon synchros?
I have no idea what kind of metrics would be possible to view/log to prove function/difference. The way the car shifts is a feel and is subjective. I'll do my best to leave my opinion out of it.

Disclaimer: I obviously cannot test the longevity of these in the short timeframe to release. I'll do my best to document the behavior changes (if any) and mileage added. At the end of the day, the purchase is yours to make or not make.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakiv View Post
I too can't wait for feedback on these. I feel like the carbon is going to act like a brake and will make the engagement smooth as butter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lust View Post
I hope these are good. They're apparently really bad in the k series transmissions.
I hope they are as well. I have taken (2) short trips to the gym thus far (I always keep it close to the shop at first after a major overhaul) and so far they seem to have positively impacted shifting. I'll expand more as I begin getting a better feel for it.

Thanks,
Eric
VerusEric is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to VerusEric For This Useful Post:
Drakiv (09-27-2017), Lust (09-27-2017), SpectreRT (09-28-2017)