View Single Post
Old 09-16-2017, 04:42 PM   #52
spike021
Senior Member
 
spike021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: '17 Limited BRZ CWP w/ PP
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,846
Thanks: 14,220
Thanked 6,568 Times in 3,255 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Ah, but I think you missed my point. It's rather obvious that the worth of the X (and the technologies it uses) will vary from person to person.

My point was quite simply that in terms of cost, it's not that much different now from how it used to be; the difference is _how_ the phone is paid off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dadhawk View Post
Cell phones are pure technology. Technology either gets cheaper over time, or price stays the same and functionality/features of value improves.

There is nothing in the iPhone X that makes it worth $1,000 to me. As I said earlier its a decent $600 phone with a $400 logo.

The "of value" for me is the key part. There is very little of value that can be added to a modern cell phone that isn't already there.

I don't need higher resolution. Current screen resolutions are more than is really needed for a 5" screen.

I don't need faster processors. I'm not planning on doing flight simulation or quantum physics on my phone.

I certainly don't need augmented reality. I can barely handle real reality at times.

I never use Nav on my phone and 99% of the time I have the GPS turned off. It's a nice to have but don't need it.

A decent camera is nice, but I don't need 3d. I could use decent low light but that's hard to get in a small package.
spike021 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to spike021 For This Useful Post:
Dadhawk (09-16-2017)