Quote:
Originally Posted by jedibow
Jon, I think it would be best to let people know that individual results may vary. I'm impressed with what all of you guys have been able to accomplish. I just don't want new people to tuning to EXPECT these number quid pro quo.
I speak from experience, no two cars are alike, what you are trying to do is remarkable in itself (a stock tuner that makes power for all) and I commend you. I think what Arghx7,s issue is that THIS car made 18whp, and it may not be standardised because of vehicle differences.
I know that when I tune Evo's yes there is a base map that I start with, and some like it and I can add more timing, decrease fueling, however on the exact same map with a different car I may have to leave it alone, or knock is present so I have to pull timing, or add fuel. You know what I mean.
As I have said many times I applaud your efforts, I just don't want people to expects these kind of results automatically.
Rant over, no to your regularly scheduled program.
G
BTW it does look as though perrin is using a different ramp for the cam phasing, for what it's worth...
|
Thanks
Based on datalogs of other cars and lachutes dynosheet results seem very repeatable between different cars.
Cam timing plays seems to play a huge role with Hp.
When trying different things out with cam timing i was able to lose 30whp from the original baseline.
Anyways this is only the beginning , more results soon
John