08-17-2017, 01:45 AM
|
#23
|
|
-
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike
I'm far more experience in balancing and game theory than you think. The proposed spec was for a track class, not an autox class, as a response to a "crossover" class.
A realistic "spec twin" Autox class?
- Camber bolts
- Tires
- Open dampers
- Open sways
- "street tires".
No other mods. If you're so insistent on a "spec" damper, then make OEM spec. As you said, make it accessible. Less mods, more accessible.
Sounds eerily familiar doesn't it?
Torque dip doesn't need to be eliminated; everyone is subject to it. It's a "feature", not a "bug".
As always, deeper pockets mean larger advantage. If you want to eliminate the "deep pockets" advantage as much as reasonable, you can even:
- Spec alignment
- OEM 17x7 wheels only
- Spec tire (and size)
|
That class already exists
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff
ineedyourdiddly
|
|
|
|