View Single Post
Old 08-07-2017, 04:01 PM   #302
humfrz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 30,432
Thanks: 29,826
Thanked 32,845 Times in 16,844 Posts
Mentioned: 715 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulca View Post
For what it's worth, I plugged in some numbers. The equation is not that scary. However it's a bit basic and does include anything for rolling resistance etc. which while small would shave a few percent off.

power=147000 (fly wheel watts)
aird=1.3
area=2.28 (sq m)
cod=0.27
x = (2*power) / (aird * cod * area )
v = e(l(x)/3) (this is a cube root)
v * 2.23694 (m/s to mph)
160.20993999770118933534

The frontal area is a guess from the total width and total height on the spec.

147,000 watts = 197 bhp.

When we modify that to "wheel hp" from a bit of googling we get:

power=117000 (157 wheel hp)
x = (2*power) / (aird * cod * area )
v = e(l(x)/3)
v * 2.23694
148.47236739928096565100
Hi ya, paulca

Your figuring appears to be accurate ........

However, the values I used are a bit different.

I used:

160 WHP (averaging several values reported on the internet)

density = 1.3

Cd = .27

frontal area = 21.2 sq. ft. (figure published by Car & Driver)

Plugging those numbers into the formula, my abacus gives me a calculated top speed of a stock 2013 FR-S, of roughly ......

157 MPH.

(I think your estimated frontal area of 2.28 m squared is a bit high)

Your thoughts ......??


humfrz
humfrz is offline   Reply With Quote