View Single Post
Old 07-11-2017, 02:51 PM   #31
CSG David
 
CSG David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: California
Posts: 2,109
Thanks: 537
Thanked 1,723 Times in 956 Posts
Mentioned: 173 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bju90 View Post
From what I read on another post that engine was built for FI and was run as NA for a little while. Probably not an indicative comparison NA.

From everything I have read/been told with trying to push more power NA it is the intake holding back the engine at high RPM. Will be interesting to see some results from CAMS/Bolt Ons for the 2017 intake as it appears to shift the peak power to the right slightly. Other than that there doesn't appear to be an affordable intake option on the market.

The engine is pretty well sorted with just bolt ons + E85. Useable torque curve with 200 peak WHP is nothing to complain about... 250+BHP would be nice though.
Stick to the 2013-2016 intake manifold over the 2017+ IM.
CSG David is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG David For This Useful Post:
bju90 (07-12-2017)