View Single Post
Old 06-30-2017, 09:51 PM   #9
Yardjass
Senior Member
 
Yardjass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Drives: '14 Monogram, '95 Miata, '90 300ZX
Location: VA
Posts: 378
Thanks: 499
Thanked 253 Times in 144 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Tire weight affects rotational inertia a lot more than wheel weight. However, it's still only on the order of 1.5x non-rotating mass (i.e, save 4 lb on tire weight and acceleration is improved as if you saved 6 lb).

But other tire qualities might be more important to you..

Continental tires are very lightweight, but they are in general also poorly rated for steering responsiveness and cornering stability.

https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests...y.jsp?ttid=190
Conti DW:
"What We'd Improve: More precise steering response and handling"

I've only had one set of Conti tires. They were lightweight for sure. But the sidewalls were limp and fun-to-driveness went right out the window...


This. Sometimes even the faster things don't feel as fast or as good to drive.


Also, if anyone has any leads on a constant of rotational moment of inertia of an actual car wheel and tire and not the theoretical stuff that google keeps bringing up, I'd love that info. I had heard weight savings in the wheel/tire package is like saving 150% before and I'd also heard it is like 1000% and I got bored so I plugged through it.




Power required to get a non-rotating item to a certain linear velocity in a certain time is:


P=E/t=0.5*m*(v^2)/t


Where:
E= Linear kinetic energy of the item
m = mass of the item
v = linear velocity of the item (equal to car's velocity)
t = time spent accelerating






Rotational kinetic energy of the rotating wheel tire = 0.5*k*m*(R^2)*(w^2) = 0.5*k*m*(v^2) since v=R*w


w=rotational velocity (radians/sec)
R=radius of wheel/tire
m = mass of the item
v = linear velocity of the item (equal to car's velocity)


So,
Power to get a wheel/tire assembly to a certain linear velocity in a certain time equals:


P=linear kinetic energy/t + rotational kinetic energy/t = [0.5*m*(v^2)/t]+[0.5*k*m*(v^2)/t]


m = mass of the wheel/tire
v = linear velocity of the wheel (equal to car's velocity)
t = time spent accelerating
k = inertial constant of rotation for wheel/tire setup


Notice how the first half of that is the same formula as for the power required to move a non-rotating object, such as a passenger in the cabin, or the exact same wheel in the trunk. The latter part is the contribution due to the wheel rotating.


So,
Total power required for wheel assembly = power required if wheel was sitting in the trunk + [0.5*k*m*(v^2)/t]


We can choose a speed and estimated acceleration time for our cars, and a decent wheel/tire mass guestimate:


v= 60mph = 27 meters/second
t = 7 seconds (rough 0-60 estimate for an NA twin)
m = 55 lbs = 25 kg


P for non rotating = [0.5*35 kg*(27(m/s)^2)/7 sec] = 1822 watts = 2.44 horsepower is required to accelerate 25 kg to 60 mph in 7 seconds


P for rotating wheel/tire = 1822 watts + [0.5*k*35 kg*(27(m/s)^2)/7 sec] = 1822 watts + 1822*k watts = 2.44 horsepower + 2.44*k horsepower


Get your k for the wheel/tire setup and you've got your answer as to how much the rotational part adds.
Yardjass is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Yardjass For This Useful Post:
lamawithonel (07-01-2017)