View Single Post
Old 05-30-2017, 10:17 AM   #42
Gforce
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: Alberta
Posts: 519
Thanks: 39
Thanked 162 Times in 109 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
Yep. They slowly dumbed down the suspension to hit what the average driver would want no doubt about that. Probably just the beginning of turning the car into a Genesis coupe clone. Many buyers (on here) would change the suspension even if it was the best ever made. The 17s will get changed at the same rate as the prior years will.
On the contrary, Subaru engineers finally told the Toyota marketing boys to butt right out. Only now is the BRZ suitable for experienced and skilled drivers.

And, no, the buyers of current BRZ would not see any need to change anything about the suspension (or the brakes and wheels if you are smart enough to realize what a bargain the PP is) of the current version. This begs the question of whether Toyota deliberately marketed a car suitable for creating a frenzy of demand in the aftermarket.

You would eventually fit better summer tires. You would be wise to fit MCA traction brackets to cure the remaining rear suspension problem caused by using the Impreza subframe unaltered from its donor car, and you might decide to fit a set of lowering springs if you lived where ground clearance isn't important and you have no appreciation for how a softer ride can actually improve handling I.e. you are too young to really understand how suspension works.

If you were really serious you would ditch the Torsen for a clutch type LSD for reasons that are fairly obvious if you understand the difference.
Gforce is offline   Reply With Quote