Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertSpool
In fact, let's make it 20hp and a unicycle. Cut out unnecessary costs like "windows" and a "radio."
Just as long as any grocery bagger can afford one. I mean, god forbid they build something amazing.
Let's shoot right square for less than mediocre!
Just give us the damn WRX style engine with FI. Like I've said before, we don't need another Tc with more aggressive styling. If people want that, just buy that. I'm sorry, I don't want every teenager with a summer job for 200 miles trying to buy this thing. Sorry if you can't afford it, I'm upset I can't afford a GTR....yet. Tell your future high school sweethearts they'll have to wait a few more years to fingerbang in the 86
Under powered quazi sport-back - Scion Tc
WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER ONE! Anything less than 220hp NA is going to be a sad joke for this car.
|
You're right, but I should clarify.
I drive a Celica GT-S (M/T). I love my car. It's not really fast but it's light and handles like a dream (and I love the way it looks inside and out). The only two things I hate about this car is that it is front wheel drive and it responds poorly to performance upgrades.
Thus, the only thing I'm looking for is a car that I like as much as my current car, but is RWD, and is easier to improve if I get bored with it.
That said, I'm fine with specs slightly better than what I'm used to, as long as the handling and suspension is superb. If everything else about the car is amazing but the HP is "low" (180-200) (but responds easy to upgrades without needing to build up the engine), then that just tells me I can slap on a few upgrades and be good to go. Or maybe there will be a higher model with better numbers.
Maybe it doesn't make sense to anyone else but to me it does. I suppose the last point is that with my expectations this "low" I won't be as disappointed with what comes out.