View Single Post
Old 03-01-2017, 07:47 PM   #48
Spartarus
...Just add nauseum
 
Spartarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: 2003 (AP1) S2000
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 546
Thanks: 310
Thanked 785 Times in 335 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvin27 View Post
The wrx wasn't a full new chassis development. So it's natural for the brz to eat more of its development budget and have not much left for a turbo configuration. I a big part of this program was for Subaru to eventually develop their FA20DIT. From this perspective consider the brz a development project. Sure, they could drop an EJ in there and job done, but it would still leave them with no 'next gen' engine. So in this case, as a new platform, yes it would cost a lot more.
The G4 chassis for the impreza / xv was new in 2011. The WRX jumped on that platform in 2014, when it adopted the DIT engine.

The 260 HP engine to which I was referring is the FA20DIT, which is almost identical to the FA20/4UGSE. The development of the two engines was virtually concurrent. Not suggesting dropping in an EJ.

The chassis was a Toyota concept, with an (almost) parts-bin Subaru suspension.

I understand why they made the decisions they made, I just think they were bad decisions.

It's a shame, because I really like the 86 platform... That, and it has a much better, classier, and more intelligent aftermarket than the S2000 does... It's really sad.
__________________
There are many ways to displace.

-Spartarus
Spartarus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Spartarus For This Useful Post:
Summerwolf (03-01-2017), Yardjass (03-02-2017)