View Single Post
Old 02-11-2017, 02:52 PM   #32
Scrappydoo
Senior Member
 
Scrappydoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Drives: Grrrr
Location: The Motherland (not France)
Posts: 599
Thanks: 330
Thanked 378 Times in 231 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
Take however you like. It's up to you to research from there. I thought Summerwolf & I were just discussing our knowledge and view instead of proving our statement. If you want me to say, my statement isn't a fact. Okay, it's not and only an opinion. Just my experiences from working on boxer engine (few blow ups lol) and learning from someone knows more than me.

Which reminds me, from his dyno post DOHC EJ tq line was interesting, so I gonna see if it's same for FB engine or FB gonna follow FA engine tq line.
Sorry.

My fault. I didn't realise you didn't know that there were other boxer engines.

i don't want to start fetching facts into this but they've been around as a type of engine for over a century.

None of them as far as I know famous for torque dips.

Exactly the opposite.

But what does everyone else know?
Scrappydoo is offline   Reply With Quote