Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB - View Single Post

Tor · 02-01-2017, 02:34 PM

This turns out to be more complicated than I thought - as usual.

Yes, something funky is going on. I tried out the last version that I pasted in the previous post and it doesn't work the way intended. It apparently wants to make a dip shape there no matter what. And now it makes a lean problem instead. No knock though. But another problem that becomes apparent is the influence on load:

http://datazap.me/u/tor/tor-204?log=...zoom=2636-2742

Compared to the normal OL fueling (that flat spot between 3600 and 3900 rpm).

http://datazap.me/u/tor/tor-201-1-ia...zoom=5894-5985

It looks like there is some benefit to correct the lean spot above 4000 rpm. This was the more moderate first attempt:

http://datazap.me/u/tor/tor-202?log=...7&zoom=627-725

So as usual, it's probably better to keep it smooth. I am going to revert this and forget about the (perhaps fake) rich dip below 4k and only concentrate on smoothening the lean spot above 4k, which seems to give better load values.

Maybe this dip shape is more to do with load limits?

02-01-2017, 02:34 PM	#11
Tor Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Drives: Toyota GT86 Location: Europe Posts: 919 Thanks: 369 Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts Mentioned: 40 Post(s) Tagged: 2 Thread(s)	This turns out to be more complicated than I thought - as usual. Yes, something funky is going on. I tried out the last version that I pasted in the previous post and it doesn't work the way intended. It apparently wants to make a dip shape there no matter what. And now it makes a lean problem instead. No knock though. But another problem that becomes apparent is the influence on load: http://datazap.me/u/tor/tor-204?log=...zoom=2636-2742 Compared to the normal OL fueling (that flat spot between 3600 and 3900 rpm). http://datazap.me/u/tor/tor-201-1-ia...zoom=5894-5985 It looks like there is some benefit to correct the lean spot above 4000 rpm. This was the more moderate first attempt: http://datazap.me/u/tor/tor-202?log=...7&zoom=627-725 So as usual, it's probably better to keep it smooth. I am going to revert this and forget about the (perhaps fake) rich dip below 4k and only concentrate on smoothening the lean spot above 4k, which seems to give better load values. Maybe this dip shape is more to do with load limits? __________________ Build: T(h)or's GT86 hammer (Europe) - essential track setup Youtube: GT86 dude Last edited by Tor; 02-07-2017 at 09:36 AM.