View Single Post
Old 01-31-2017, 09:07 PM   #8
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Yes, now it works, I had to change my Windows settings (decimal and point for numbers) ! Or maybe I did it wrong the first time .. one way or another, it works

Edit: Which Wayno MAF scale do you use? The default one (+2%) or the lean one ?
Wayno used logs from my car (among others I presume) as a test subject when making the new MAF scales for the tunes with the new injector ratios. So I have one from those tests.

I tried the +1.5 and it gave a really nice result too (still stg 1):
http://datazap.me/u/tor/stg1-102-v12...zoom=9515-9631

As you can see I had +2 LTFT with the +1.5, and near perfect AFR. LTFT doesn't matter diddly squat with the new injector ratios because there is no split at 5000 rpm which usually messed up AFR if the LTFT were off on either side. The only thing that matters is that AFR is correct in OL, which can be adjusted easily by adjusting the MAF above 3.20 volt.

Even though LTFT of +2 doesn't matter, I decided to use the custom MAF that came from testing on my car for another reason. The benefit for me is that it practically doesn't have to learn anything (see, the last log screenshot - +0.28 LTFT and the AFR is where it should be). So I can pretty much "flash and drive" without thinking about learning. I don't drive that much and disconnect the battery a lot so it has value to me.

Anyway, I don't think that it will have an influence on the adjustment made in OL fueling here which scale you use. Since it's more of an adjustment for the AVCS (or whatever is causing the bumps).

Last edited by Tor; 02-07-2017 at 09:38 AM.
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote