View Single Post
Old 01-23-2017, 09:48 PM   #31
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 557 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
I played around with some MAF scaling (generated by a friend) , the lean hump at 4 - 4.5k rpm was then resolved. However the rich dip at 3.5 - 4k rpm remained.
Yes it's difficult because it all happens between 3 and 3.4 volts when you only have 2 point on the curve to manipulate. I could try and richen up 3.4 a notch, but I am guessing it would create another problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
.... Just take some fuel out the fuel map. If MAF scale is good, then don't use that to fix it. There's more than one way to do it
You mean instead fix it in open loop fueling so that AFR becomes correct and AFR_Command has the tops and valleys instead?

Quote:
Originally Posted by solidONE View Post
I believe Vdyno measure how quickly RPM's build for a given gearing/weight to make it's calculations. Therefore, a spike in the RPM will be falsely calculated as an increase in power.
Yes, that's what I meant with locally more power. But once the wheels grip again I would assume the subsequent data would then be calculated as a decrease and looking over a bigger part of the graf RPM would build slower because time was wasted spinning the wheels?
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote