Guys, I must admit I this thread was a mistake. Thank you for all your input. I apologize much for wasting your time!
I didn't do my due diligence and jumped to conclusions. I relied on memory and didn't load up all my old logs. I used one perhaps too optimistic log as a reference.
Anyway, loading up a bunch of logs, sorting and discarding based on shape and deviating number in either direction I came up with this. Admittedly it's biased towards the better numbers - but hey that what the pros do too
So in reality, I may be around 175-177 hp now vs. 168-170 before. More important than the actual number, this gap is present in the whole curve now. So I'm more inclined now to go through the hassle of keeping it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by solidONE
You could try making it run a bit leaner and see if you can get a few more ponies from that. The OFH ignition advance is already pretty aggressive, though you could try adding ignition advance incrementally where there is no knock corrections.
|
It's already running pretty lean at 11.7 and there is already some slight FLKC, so I don't think it will be more headache that gain going in that direction. Also, this needs to be a track capable tune.
Quote:
The tire size you inputted will have an effect on the Vdyno calculations and total weight to a lesser extent. The numbers might be slightly off between different wheel/tire setups, so that might have thrown your numbers off a little. Though 174Hp with a stg1 tune and stock header is pretty impressive. It's quite possible that the stg.1 pull you did was reading high. Good luck.
For your reference, my stg 1 tune got me about 165-168hp on 91 fuel. Stg 2 with Tomei EL my pulls were getting between 178-181hp pretty consistently.
|
Yes, the above now better match those numbers. I'll do some more runs at different temperatures later on, maybe the compensations cause deviations too. Best thing would be a pull at 20 deg C and with the other wheels.