View Single Post
Old 01-08-2017, 05:32 PM   #1410
daiheadjai
Senior Member
 
daiheadjai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2003 S2000, 2008 Fit
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,990
Thanks: 2,584
Thanked 1,154 Times in 688 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Re_Invention View Post
You think so? I think Toyota did great with the Scion brand when you consider it was only a marketing strategy which required far less capital investment than a new product range as it was all already existing product or a modification of an existing product (FR-S notwithstanding and see Subaru collaboration to mitigate costs!).

The last gen Celica sold 49,600 units over four years. And that was an excellent car in my opinion, hatchback practicality, very sporty looks, attractive price point, sporty handling without being stiff or unsettling, pandered to both casual daily drivers (1.8 matched to a 5 spd auto getting 36 mpg) and driving enthusiasts (1.8 Yamaha built 9k rpm screamer matched to a 6 mt) with the typical Toyota reliability and storied Celica namesake. The tC sold over 245,000 units in its first fours years and that's just a Camry coupe. And they were the same price new. You can see where the success was and where the Youth voted (5x over for the 'inferior' product!).

Looking at the Scion brand sales were 11k, 99k, 156k, 173k, 130k, 114k, 58k, 46k, 49k, 74k, 68k in its first decade (2003 - 2012) which included the market turn down in 2008 that saw major decline in consumer spending across the board, and they still maintained above 50k units per year until their termination. That's nearly 40% of all Subaru brand sales in the United States over the same period. Not bad for a sub-brand in my opinion.

Now, culturally speaking, I think there is less of a case for any Youth brand with the shifting market desire for automobiles, the type of product (hybrid, ev, 'smart', etc.) stricter regulations and fewer drivers. Consider the five years between 1999 to 2004 saw an increased in licensed active drivers go up 11,719,000 where as from 2009 to 2014 saw only a positive change of 4,474,000 active licensed drivers. Of course, we'd have to look at median age/birth/death/immigration rates over the same periods and trailing 16 years to get a better picture but just on face value it shows a significant drop in licensed drivers gained to begin with.

Either way, I really like the 7th gen Celica
Don't get me wrong, I had a 7th Gen Celica and loved it (my first complaint with my BRZ was that it wasn't a hatchback). I think it was outsold by the tC more because by 2006 (the first tC year) the Celica had been languishing without meaningful updates and would soon be canceled.

I just felt that Scion was a cynical rebadged exercise (the xA and xD being just a Yaris/Echo hatchback in a hoodie).

The first tC wasn't bad either, nor was the xB (first gen), but it seemed like those were the only mainstream Scion products that benefited from real effort. The FRS and iQ were more niche, though I still think the iQ was pretty cool. Eh, maybe I'm wrong and Scion was just a victim of bad timing and market conditions.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
daiheadjai is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to daiheadjai For This Useful Post:
gymratter (01-08-2017), Mr.Impreza (01-08-2017)