Quote:
Originally Posted by Tor
Searching for timing compensation per cylinder led me back to this thread. I wonder why Shiv zeroed it out in the most recent OFH tune but kept it in the regular stg 2 UEL tunes?
Otherwise, Wayno uses the AVCS from the the OFH tune. Total timing (base plus KCA) on the 102 tune is not significantly different - give and take (some areas more, some less). Except above 6800 rpm and load 0.9 and in 0.6-0.7 load, lower rpm range, where OFH has significantly more.
- I'll might add the timing difference above 6800 rpm to the Wayno 102 tune, but I am not sure if I should leave the TCPC or zero it out?
- Or I could start with zeroing TCPC out (without adding timing) and see if it makes a difference first.
- Of course, I could also just leave it all alone and enjoy hassle free timing.
Decisions, decisions. The bite of the damn optimization bug is annoying. Does anyone have the antidote? 
|
I believe the timing compensation per cylinder is because some cylinders may run slightly hotter or be more knock prone than others. So theoretically you may be able to run more base timing and just retard the problem cylinder or cylinders slightly, but going to be difficult without getting individual cylinder knock data