View Single Post
Old 01-03-2017, 07:04 PM   #32
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,633 Times in 1,113 Posts
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNREAL View Post
Wow 270-280 on 91 Fuel and on stock internals and normal engine compression? that would be great, if verified I'll go for E-Force.
I would say that those figures on 91 Oct/95 RON are highly optimistic. I'd expect no more than ~265whp on 93 octane without any manifold changes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UNREAL View Post
I 'wanted to go Cosworth way since day 1 when you released stage 2.0, but the lack of solid numbers + the lack of dyno numbers from the consumers made me hesitant to do it... till today my eyes are at Cosworth kit... but I'll be honest, I don't have enough facts that justifies the insane cost. and I asked a while ago about if there is any validated data for stress testing this kit in extreme weather, I didn't get any.
Harrop being in Australia probably has the most time spent in hot temps, however the Cosworth has been stress tested on an engine dyno to simulate hours of track time. It's well known that the kit is good at heat management, which is where the issues normally arise. However based on there being "no validated data", you face the same dilemma with all 3 options.



Apologies for the small image but it's the best I can get quickly. Both on UK 99 RON I believe so gives a good quick comparison.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post:
UNREAL (01-23-2017)