Quote:
Originally Posted by VeloxEric
Swan neck is superior for wing performance, there are plenty of blogs/articles/documentation about this. We may do our own blog at some point on it. In certain instances it doesn't make sense to have the added complexity of swan neck mounting or it is outlawed in regulations.
That's the inherent problem with judging off of what top tier racing teams do; they all have rules that govern what can and cannot be done to limit costs and performance. All too often enthusiasts get stuck on what a company did or didn't do and they don't understand that this company is making a compromise in performance to stay within class rules.
We're looking into this style of mounting but I think it will be difficult to make it look good without the wing hanging pretty far rearward of the trunk. I believe this puts a wing like this out of classes.
We're attempting to come up with something that mounts to the trunk while remaining rigid for the forces it will produce.
I picked up a spare trunk that I will be able to cut into and figure out rigidity on. Looking forward to getting something finalized, hopefully, within the next month and prototypes a few months after.
Thanks,
Eric
|
Just curious would it affect the aero that much if the swan neck came from the back instead of the front
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk