[justinco]

The rules are being followed. You can dream up all these performance benefits or spirit of the rule or whatever, but this case has an explicit allowance.

Here you go...

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Doug G. <edit> wrote:
Hi, Justin,

Yes, you are welcome to share my email. And I’ll be glad to discuss it with anyone. J

Later,

-Doug
Doug G.
SCCA® Solo® Competition Manager
1-800-770-2055

From: Justin M.
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 10:56 AM
To: Doug G. <edit>
Subject: Re: Solo Street Touring rules question

Thanks Doug,

There was some debate on one of the BRZ/FRS forums in an STX rules thread on whether these were legal or not. I just wanted to get some clarification on my thoughts.

Is it ok to share this on the forums so others can benefit and clear up some of the misconceptions?

Justin

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Doug G. <edit> wrote:
Hi, Justin,

Yes, it is a fair assumption that the STI under spoiler is allowed per 2016 Solo Rules section 14.2.F.2 (page 78). However, I would never say it is “clear” that it’s allowed. (I have never seen a protest committee that wanted to rule a competitor was non-compliant.)

But I agree with you – the Solo Rules allow it. Even the description says it “gives the BRZ a mean, ground-hugging look”; nothing about improved stability at highway speeds or anything like that.

You could ask for an official clarification from the SEB, but I really don’t think it’s necessary. It could take months to get an answer. www.sebscca.com or www.soloeventsboard.com

Hope this helps. I’ll be glad to discuss this further.

-Doug
Doug G.
SCCA® Solo® Competition Manager
1-800-770-2055

From: Justin M.
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 7:02 PM
To: Doug G. <edit>
Subject: Solo Street Touring rules question

Hey Doug,

I had a question regarding a rule for Street Touring. The rule is below which is part of section 14.2.

F. Addition of spoilers, splitters, rear wings, bumper covers, valances, side skirts, and non-functional scoops/vents is allowed provided that either:
1. It is a production part which is standard or optional equipment of a US model of the vehicle. (“Model” is defined in Section 12.)
2. It is listed in the vehicle manufacturer’s US accessory catalog for that vehicle for normal highway use. This does not allow for parts sold through a manufacturer’s performance catalog (e.g., Ford Racing, HPD, Mazdaspeed, Mopar Performance, Mugen, NISMO, SPT, TRD, etc). Parts must be installed as directed by the manufacturer. Exact replicas,including weight, from alternate sources are also permitted.

I installed a BRZ STi front under-spoiler (Subaru part) for my BRZ which is in STX. It comes from the Subaru accessory catalog titled "2017 BRZ Accessories."

http://www.subaru.com/content/dam/su...ccessories.pdf

Since this part is in an accessory catalog (not a performance catalog) and has been installed as directed by the manufacturer, it should be legal to use. Is this a fair assumption? I imagine if there was a protest against it, there is clear evidence in this rule that says it would be legal (because it is part of an accessory catalog, regardless if it is an "STi" branded part).

Thanks!
Justin