View Single Post
Old 12-01-2016, 12:20 PM   #193
justatroll
Senior Member
 
justatroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: Full race 4cyl boxer
Location: CO, USA
Posts: 587
Thanks: 310
Thanked 510 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenRuleAThumb View Post
This was at an 86 dyno day with 12 86 dynoing the same day, full results in northern California forum. Stock was 136 on same dyno for wheel power.

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=109320
So, since the dyno guy fucked up measuring even a stock vehicle, that gives MORE credibility to your measurement?
I guess since they tested ALL of the cars with the wrong dyno settings so that makes it OK?

The 41 hp drivetrain loss is incorrect, there is no arguing that.
(unless you are dragging a dead horse behind the car of course)
This is not something the dyno can measure, it is a value the dyno operator has to enter (a priori knowledge)

Again, in a stock car we see 174 hp at the wheels (well documented)
The hp rating at the crank is 200 hp

200 -174 = 26hp
26/200 = .13 or 13%

WHY would that change just by adding a few hp at the crank?
Answer - it doesn't.

So IF you measured 174.6 at the wheels, you engine has almost exactly the stock hp rating.
There is just no way to argue that is not the case (other than 'the dyno guy said so')
__________________
Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a Pig in the mud. You are never going to win and after a couple of hours you realize that he likes it.
justatroll is offline   Reply With Quote